top of page

Interim Crit and Responses

Interim Crit 1

Comments:

- Overall comments are average.

- Need to firmed up with the programmes

- Connection and responses with existing building need to be clear

- Structural study in detail is needed to avoid bulky looking column and visual connectivity.

- Locate major nodes to have better pedestrian flow.

MCO Crit (Internal)

Comments:

Dr. Zaky

  1. There seems to be nothing happening in the corridor. So the idea of life happens during a journey does not come out.

  2. It is good if you have some survey to support programme you have within the 'serpent'

  3. Try to treat your building as incidental space along a journey, people do not go to your building, but they do activities there when they are moving in a journey.

Dr. Wan

  1. Currently have 3 nodes where people oriented themselves but nothing happen in the corridors.

  2. Corridor as main design

Ar. Kalsom

  1. More understanding on my thesis project now, design the essence, the corridor. (Same comment as Dr. Zaky)

Ar. Sofie

  1. Lack of contextual response, need more narration on it, previously has but gone now.

  2. Momentum of floor plan and 3D planning

  3. Blocks in diff area

  4. Need narration from diff users ( city user, local user, freelancer user, tourist user) , how dedicate to everyone

  5. Do more sectional study (linear sections)

 

My concerns and direction in response

  1. Confuse about grid line and structures

  2. Still will remain the central nodes with more fragmented parts on corridor.

  3. Will further develop on overall layout.

Interim Crit 2 (External)

Panel 1

1. approach not clear

2. have to study on acts & by-law about air space usage, DBKL

3. question about the real issue

Panel 2

1. what is the real issue and underlying theory?

2. missing continuity from abstract

3. not a complete design narrative

4. back track and prioritize on real issue

Conclusion & Response

  1. The presentation unable to deliver the full idea to the panels.

  2. Architecture vocabulary and the verbal presentation should be improved.

  3. Every decision of the design should be narrated with suitable method to express the complete image to the panels, complete verbal and visual presentation is needed.

  4. Should include performance criteria on first board

  • facebook
  • Twitter Round
  • flickr

© 2023 by Dawkins & Dodger Architecture. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page